Don't really get it, care to explain ? On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sergey Beryozkin-5 wrote: > > > > This causes problems when doing non-Spring CXF deployments. > > Generally, we should really try to keep the Spring related code in > .spring > > subpackages as it will make it simpler for CXF be integrated with other > > similar frameworks or deployed in containers providing the optional > Spring > > support only. > > > > I wonder if we could just rename Spring to Banana and use Banana's JARs > instead. Such a wrapping would allow us to use Spring to our heart's > content while at the same time truthfully saying we're 100% Spring-free. > (Or would we then need to worry about supporting non-Banana deployments? > :) > > -- > View this message in context: > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/JMS-transport-strongly-depends-on-Spring-tp2262704p2264402.html > Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
