Hi Christian On 30/01/12 10:34, Christian Schneider wrote:
We currently have a transports/common project that only contains the gzip feature. As this feature is even used from core I propose we move it there and remove the whole transports/common module.
As far as I recall the gzip feature was in transports/http originally and then there was a demand for GZIP be supported at the JMS level...
I proposed to move it to transports/common as opposed to rt/core, it does not seem to belong to the core really, as it's a very transport specific feature
I would like to change the package name from org.apache.cxf.transport.common.gzip to org.apache.cxf.gzip. To remain compatible I would leave a copy of the classes in the old package with @Deprecated annotation.
I'd still propose to scope 'gzip', may be not with 'common' but with something else
Cheers, Sergey
Christian
