There is one thing that might be different.
I recently "committed/pushed" a change from a non committer to karaf. I
proposed to the developer to fork the karaf repo on github and commit
and push there. I then thought to use a github pull request but this
probably would not have worked as the karaf repo at github is readonly.
So I pulled his changes into my own checkout and pushed them to karaf at
apache. So the commits still had his name in them. JB then told me that
this is probably not allowed.
So the question is: how would the process look like for pull requests?
Is it ok that the original non committer name is in the commit or do we
have to avoid this?
Christian
Am 22.01.2014 15:40, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
Anyone who is a committer will be able to “push” changes into the
canonical repo here at Apache. Honestly, for committers, you can use
git just like you you git-svn or just svn today. Just instead of “git
svn dcommit” or “svn commit” it would be a “git push”. If you don’t
want your workflow to change, you don’t really need it to change. The
commands are just a little different and many of the operations
perform much faster.
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
