> > > > The downside is for the files that have existed since 2.1, a "git > > blame" and log and such will only go back to 2.1. Blame will list me > > as the person for any lines that have existed since 2.1 (since I did > > the "release:prepare" for 2.1 and all the commits prior to that are > > squashed up into there). We could go back a little further than 2.1 if > > we feel it's overly important. Or, we could even move up to 2.2 or > > later if we feel it's not at all important. :-) > > Sounds good to me. Of course it is important that we still know the history of > older files for legal reasons. I think this should work though if we keep the > old svn repo in read only mode. For any other practical uses I think 2.1 > should > be fine as the oldest history.
That sounds reasonable for me as well. Glad to work with "pure" git in CXF. Regards, Andrei. > > Christian > > > -- > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Open Source Architect > http://www.talend.com
