Hey Andy,
Certainly +1, I think CXF would be a great place to host HTTP-based
MP GraphQL implementation. I am wondering (probably related to Romain's
2nd point) if the intention is to implement the specification from scratch
or pull in graphql-java? In any case, I think it would be great addition to
CXF, count me in.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
Thursday, January 3, 2019, 5:49:34 PM, you wrote:
RMB> +1
RMB> Two small side notes:
RMB> 1. If cxf is not the right "home", geronimo would definitively be (
RMB> http://geronimo.apache.org/microprofile/ to be concrete)
RMB> 2. From my past experience having a graphql parser API (body reader for
RMB> jaxrs/mp) is the most important feature, everything else is mainly the link
RMB> to the backend and highly depends impl choices and the abstraction a
RMB> framework gives is often more an issue (N+1 queries to cite one obvious
RMB> common problem) than a solution even if tempting
RMB> Le jeu. 3 janv. 2019 23:29, Andy McCright <j.andrew.mccri...@gmail.com> a
RMB> écrit :
>> Hi All,
>> I've been involved in an effort to create a MicroProfile GraphQL project
>> that would provide a Java framework for building and deploying GraphQL
>> apps. The API would look similar to JAX-RS (i.e. @Query annotations
>> instead of @GET, etc.).
>> We have a draft project proposal available here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prwMGxgr0cI5yx4lrvMET5x6rD-CQ1y7XuS1PCegE4A/edit#
>> Would this be something that we could implement in a new CXF module? And
>> would anybody on this list be interested in participating in the MP spec
>> project?
>> Thanks in advance!
>> Andy
>> PS - we have a spec project meeting tomorrow at 10:30am US Eastern time.
>> Meeting minutes (and a link to the webex) is available here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gb3jirFGrJwDZSbrtnFPVTNjPNe3Y0dUYfm-HkU1c3U/edit#
