+1 Everything looks okay in my cursory review. The presence of "daffodil-lib-<VERSION>" strings in the LICENSE and NOTICE files are not a mistake; they are a deliberate decision to reduce the number of places where the Daffodil version must be changed to only one file (build.sbt).
I checked: [OK] incubating in name [OK] no unexpected differences between 3.0.0 unpacked bin and 2.7.0 unpacked bin [OK] tgz and zip have same contents [OK] src has same contents as my git checkout (minus KEYS file) [OK] src and bins include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER [OK] no binaries in source [OK] JavaDocs and ScalaDocs look correct Can we update the "Unsupported Features" page (https://daffodil.apache.org/unsupported/) for any changes in Daffodil 3.0.0 as well? We might want to add this page to the release workflow (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DAFFODIL/Release+Workflow) as part of the "Update the Website" section. John -----Original Message----- From: Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 3:23 PM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1 Hi all, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1. All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/3.0.0-rc1/ Staging artifacts can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1019/ This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here: https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.0.0-rc1. For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.0.0: https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.0.0 For a summary of the changes in this release, see: https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.0.0/ Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, 2 November 2020, 3:30 EST). [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Thanks, - Steve
