Lola,

I just noticed the NOT OK on the rat check. The .bsp/ directory is a
generated file that is generated when you start sbt using the sbt
console, e.g.

  $ sbt
  > ratCheck

If instead you run it without the console, e.g.:

  $ sbt ratCheck

then sbt doesn't generate this file and that ratCheck passes.

The ratCheck command is supposed to use the .gitignore file to ignore
file, which includes the .bsp directory, so I'm not sure why that isn't
working.

But this .bsp directory should just be ignored and doesn't affect the
rat results since it is auto generated. I'll create a ticket to get this
fixed so we can run ratCheck from the console, but I don't think is
considered a release stopper.


On 11/2/20 1:49 PM, Olabusayo Kilo wrote:
> +1
> 
> I checked:
> 
> [OK] links in email are correct
> [OK] verified Summary of Changes pages (maven, sbt and download)
> [OK] JavaDoc and ScalaDoc are correct
> [NOT OK] RAT check passes; .bsp/sbt.json file?
> [OK] ~50 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests
> 
> On 10/30/20 3:23 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
>> 3.0.0-rc1.
>>
>> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>> found at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/3.0.0-rc1/
>>
>> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1019/
>>
>>
>> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
>> corresponding to slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
>> file here:
>>
>> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>>
>> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.0.0-rc1.
>>
>> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.0.0:
>>
>> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.0.0
>>
>> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>>
>> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.0.0/
>>
>> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
>> (Monday, 2 November 2020, 3:30 EST).
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Steve
>>
> 

Reply via email to