I just pushed the main branch per the agreed githash to the new repo.


On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 4:21 PM John Wass <jwa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Steps 1-7 sound good to me.  Some thoughts
>
> > 1) push to https://github.com/apache/daffodil-vscode repository.
>
> Who is going to push the code?
>
> > 2) move over github issues to the new repo issues
>
> It doesn't look like the "transfer issue" function works across orgs.  So a
> manual move it shall be.
>
> > 3) move wiki pages/doc to the github wiki associated with the new
> repository
>
> Same thing, manual copy.  Not as significant as issue moving.
>
> > 4) archive the old original github repo (for posterity).
>
> Concur. I'd say this happens first to ensure nothing drifts while we are
> moving things around.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 10:41 AM Mike Beckerle <mbecke...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > With the IP-clearance now complete, next steps (I think) are:
> >
> > 1) push to https://github.com/apache/daffodil-vscode repository.
> > I believe the existing repo main branch should be pushed here as is,
> i.e.,
> > no need to squash anything.
> > Note the main branch is named "main", not master.
> > Tag it at the current point on the main branch. (suggest tag name
> > apache-ip-clearance ? or happy-apache-birthday ?)
> > 2) move over github issues to the new repo issues
> > 3) move wiki pages/doc to the github wiki associated with the new
> > repository
> > 4) archive the old original github repo (for posterity).
> > 5) update main daffodil-site pages to mention/highlight the new vscode
> > debugger and link to its issues and wiki.
> > 6) whatever else I forgot
> >
> > and....
> >
> > 7) start planning for release 1.0.0.
> >
> > I am not sure what additional things are needed in order to meet Apache
> > criteria for release, given the vscode marketplace as a means of
> > distribution. Perhaps we don't need to solve that yet?
> >
> > I think we covered almost everything else during the IP-clearance
> process.
> >
> > If there are things, let's discuss them here on the dev list.
> >
>

Reply via email to