:clap: On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 1:44 PM Mike Beckerle <mbecke...@apache.org> wrote:
> I just pushed the main branch per the agreed githash to the new repo. > > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 4:21 PM John Wass <jwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Steps 1-7 sound good to me. Some thoughts > > > > > 1) push to https://github.com/apache/daffodil-vscode repository. > > > > Who is going to push the code? > > > > > 2) move over github issues to the new repo issues > > > > It doesn't look like the "transfer issue" function works across orgs. > So a > > manual move it shall be. > > > > > 3) move wiki pages/doc to the github wiki associated with the new > > repository > > > > Same thing, manual copy. Not as significant as issue moving. > > > > > 4) archive the old original github repo (for posterity). > > > > Concur. I'd say this happens first to ensure nothing drifts while we are > > moving things around. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 10:41 AM Mike Beckerle <mbecke...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > With the IP-clearance now complete, next steps (I think) are: > > > > > > 1) push to https://github.com/apache/daffodil-vscode repository. > > > I believe the existing repo main branch should be pushed here as is, > > i.e., > > > no need to squash anything. > > > Note the main branch is named "main", not master. > > > Tag it at the current point on the main branch. (suggest tag name > > > apache-ip-clearance ? or happy-apache-birthday ?) > > > 2) move over github issues to the new repo issues > > > 3) move wiki pages/doc to the github wiki associated with the new > > > repository > > > 4) archive the old original github repo (for posterity). > > > 5) update main daffodil-site pages to mention/highlight the new vscode > > > debugger and link to its issues and wiki. > > > 6) whatever else I forgot > > > > > > and.... > > > > > > 7) start planning for release 1.0.0. > > > > > > I am not sure what additional things are needed in order to meet Apache > > > criteria for release, given the vscode marketplace as a means of > > > distribution. Perhaps we don't need to solve that yet? > > > > > > I think we covered almost everything else during the IP-clearance > > process. > > > > > > If there are things, let's discuss them here on the dev list. > > > > > >
