Will there be any problem with updating the readme in the old repo to note
that it is relocated?

On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 4:20 PM John Wass <jwa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Steps 1-7 sound good to me.  Some thoughts
>
> > 1) push to https://github.com/apache/daffodil-vscode repository.
>
> Who is going to push the code?
>
> > 2) move over github issues to the new repo issues
>
> It doesn't look like the "transfer issue" function works across orgs.  So
> a manual move it shall be.
>
> > 3) move wiki pages/doc to the github wiki associated with the new
> repository
>
> Same thing, manual copy.  Not as significant as issue moving.
>
> > 4) archive the old original github repo (for posterity).
>
> Concur. I'd say this happens first to ensure nothing drifts while we are
> moving things around.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 10:41 AM Mike Beckerle <mbecke...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> With the IP-clearance now complete, next steps (I think) are:
>>
>> 1) push to https://github.com/apache/daffodil-vscode repository.
>> I believe the existing repo main branch should be pushed here as is, i.e.,
>> no need to squash anything.
>> Note the main branch is named "main", not master.
>> Tag it at the current point on the main branch. (suggest tag name
>> apache-ip-clearance ? or happy-apache-birthday ?)
>> 2) move over github issues to the new repo issues
>> 3) move wiki pages/doc to the github wiki associated with the new
>> repository
>> 4) archive the old original github repo (for posterity).
>> 5) update main daffodil-site pages to mention/highlight the new vscode
>> debugger and link to its issues and wiki.
>> 6) whatever else I forgot
>>
>> and....
>>
>> 7) start planning for release 1.0.0.
>>
>> I am not sure what additional things are needed in order to meet Apache
>> criteria for release, given the vscode marketplace as a means of
>> distribution. Perhaps we don't need to solve that yet?
>>
>> I think we covered almost everything else during the IP-clearance process.
>>
>> If there are things, let's discuss them here on the dev list.
>>
>

Reply via email to