we haven't seen a nice name so far -> i would keep what we have right now (it's redundant, but at least a bit more expressive).
regards, gerhard 2014-02-18 10:20 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > I do agree on @Managed not being very expressive. Think about the > @ManagedBean disaster in JavaEE itself. 'Managed' is in the same ballpark > like 'Class' or 'Object'. > > Managed by whom and what? > In that case I'd rather go with @DeltaSpike or keep @Web... > But I do not care that much about names... > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 18 February 2014, 10:15, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > @Gerhard: yeah but managed is not expressive, doesnt give the origin + > >is quite standard for jmxso i would avoid it. That said it doesnt > >bring any feature so i dont want to fight for a name. > >Romain Manni-Bucau > >Twitter: @rmannibucau > >Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > >LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > >Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > > >2014-02-18 10:12 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>: > >> @romain: > >> you will always have same/similar terms in different areas (see e.g. > >> "message"). > >> > >> regards, > >> gerhard > >> > >> >
