That's would be ambiguous with JavaEE 6 Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-23 22:12 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > What about reusing javax.annotation.Priority? > > > 2014-02-23 22:02 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>: > >> it's just a stereotype to get a better tool-support... >> @Advanced is also a qualifier (at least in codi). >> >> however, we need "ordinal" or we add @InvocationOrder as it was in codi. >> once we do that, we break the consistency in that area. >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - >> JavaEE Consulting, Development and >> Courses in English and German >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> >> >> 2014-02-23 21:41 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com >> >: >> >> > Another problem is that @web is a qualifier and @JsfPhaseListener is a >> > stereotype and not a qualifier. >> > >> > So if we would change it, we must use different annotations. Right? >> > >> > IMO >> > @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext context; >> > would be great as it's just like a namespace. >> > >> > For the @JsfPhaseListener, something like @Advanced would be better. >> > >> > >> > 2014-02-18 11:16 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko < >> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com >> > >: >> > >> > > IMO it's actually more expressive than any other names. Maybe >> > > @DeltaSpikeManaged would be more impressive... >> > > >> > > +1 @DeltaSpike then, before keeping the old redudant/"ugly" qualifiers. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > 2014-02-18 10:51 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >> > > >> > > +1 kind of tradeoff >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> > >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> > >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> > >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> > >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> 2014-02-18 10:46 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek < >> gerhard.petra...@gmail.com >> > >: >> > >> > we haven't seen a nice name so far -> i would keep what we have >> right >> > >> now >> > >> > (it's redundant, but at least a bit more expressive). >> > >> > >> > >> > regards, >> > >> > gerhard >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > 2014-02-18 10:20 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: >> > >> > >> > >> >> I do agree on @Managed not being very expressive. Think about the >> > >> >> @ManagedBean disaster in JavaEE itself. 'Managed' is in the same >> > >> ballpark >> > >> >> like 'Class' or 'Object'. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Managed by whom and what? >> > >> >> In that case I'd rather go with @DeltaSpike or keep @Web... >> > >> >> But I do not care that much about names... >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> LieGrue, >> > >> >> strub >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On Tuesday, 18 February 2014, 10:15, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> > >> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >> @Gerhard: yeah but managed is not expressive, doesnt give the >> origin >> > + >> > >> >> >is quite standard for jmxso i would avoid it. That said it doesnt >> > >> >> >bring any feature so i dont want to fight for a name. >> > >> >> >Romain Manni-Bucau >> > >> >> >Twitter: @rmannibucau >> > >> >> >Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> > >> >> >LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> > >> >> >Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >2014-02-18 10:12 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek < >> > >> gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>: >> > >> >> >> @romain: >> > >> >> >> you will always have same/similar terms in different areas (see >> > e.g. >> > >> >> >> "message"). >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> regards, >> > >> >> >> gerhard >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >>
