@mark

That's what I based it on actually.


On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> You can look at batchee.
>
> Romain configured offline doc (with markdown, but could also be asciidoc)
> and mvn scm-publish
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> On Sat, 9/8/14, John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Subject: Re: DeltaSpike docs plan
>  To: "deltaspike" <[email protected]>
>  Date: Saturday, 9 August, 2014, 15:54
>
>  Actually, from digging
>  around their code, might have an easier solution, so
>  long as everyone agrees.
>
>  I have a small POC setup here:
>
> https://github.com/johnament/deltaspike/commit/402becc0e450e551570107a1661d39e9eb6a43cb
>
>  I setup a local VM w/ a SVN
>  repo to test it out.  Basically, we can
>  generate the asciidoc locally using mvn site,
>  then run mvn site-deploy to
>  move the
>  rendered files to staging.  Once done, login to CMS and
>  promote to
>  prod.
>
>  The only change would be to get infra to switch
>  our script to use the shell
>  option.  It
>  does put the rendering process on whoever is writing the
>  docs,
>  but since it's using the java
>  plugin and jruby, nothing should need to be
>  downloaded separately to machines.
>
>
>  On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:55
>  PM, Rafael Benevides <[email protected]>
>  wrote:
>
>  > I
>  remember that someone said that CMS already supports
>  remote
>  > repositories. Can't we start
>  by having this documents moved soon while we
>  > discuss about the asciidoc rendering ?
>  >
>  > Em 8/8/14, 10:53,
>  Gerhard Petracek escreveu:
>  >
>  >  @john:
>  >> the
>  infra team is usually not the blocking part (if there is
>  no
>  >> significant
>  >> technical issue and they don't get
>  a new heavy part to maintain).
>  >>
>  >> regards,
>  >>
>  gerhard
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> 2014-08-08
>  15:37 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>:
>  >>
>  >>  I think we
>  need to convince infra@ that these are all must needed
>  >>> features.
>  >>>   From looking at the
>  code behind CMS, it would appear that it's the one
>  >>> calling markdown based on the
>  imports in our files.  Unless we want to do
>  >>> something crazy like render
>  asciidoc in markdown format, then hand that
>  >>> over for rendering..
>  >>>
>  >>> Still
>  would need to convince that pulling from git over the svn
>  site is
>  >>> ideal as well.
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  John
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>> On
>  Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Rafael Benevides <[email protected]>
>  >>> wrote:
>  >>>
>  >>>  Em
>  8/8/14, 6:49, Pete Muir escreveu:
>  >>>>
>  >>>>   On 7 Aug 2014, at
>  18:47, Rafael Benevides <[email protected]>
>  >>>> wrote:
>  >>>>
>  >>>>>   Before we
>  have a deal with Michelle's team about these content
>  >>>>> changes,
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>> I think we should
>  close the two other definitions:
>  >>>>>>
>  >>>>>> - docs location: move
>  to deltaspike sources, create a new repository,
>  >>>>>> other?
>  >>>>>>
>  >>>>>>  +1 to move to
>  sources
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>  +1 to move to sources
>  >>>>
>  >>>>    and
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>> -docs format: markdown
>  or asciidoc
>  >>>>>>
>  >>>>>>  +1 for asciidoc.
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>  +1 for asciidoc
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  However I believe we also
>  need agree on:
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>> * add support for asciidoc
>  to Apache CMS
>  >>>>> * add
>  support for importing external repo to Apache CMS
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>> so that the docs can still
>  be build as part of the website.
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>   From what
>  people have said in the past, both are possible, if
>  someone
>  >>>>> (e.g. Rafael
>  ;-) can spend a couple of days doing it.
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>  Definitely I would like
>  to help/handle that. I believe that both
>  >>>>
>  >>>
>  (asciidoc
>  >>>
>  >>>> support + importing external
>  repo) will bring open doors to
>  >>>> documentation
>  >>>> contribution.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>    I believe that we should
>  propose a vote to decided this, otherwise it
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>> can become an endless
>  discussion. Wdyt ?
>  >>>>>>
>  >>>>>>
>  >>>>>>
>  >>>>>> Em 8/4/14, 17:28,
>  Gerhard Petracek escreveu:
>  >>>>>>
>  >>>>>>  @suggested content
>  changes:
>  >>>>>>> +1
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>> regards,
>  >>>>>>> gerhard
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>> 2014-08-01 18:46
>  GMT+02:00 Rafael Benevides <[email protected]
>  >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>      Hi all,
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>      As you may
>  known, Red Hat docs team was called to help on
>  >>>>>>>      DeltaSpike
>  docs. After a long period, they have analyzed the
>  >>>>>>>
>  documentation and bring us an awesome plan that is
>  available
>  >>>>>>>
>  here:
>  >>>>>>>
>  https://docs.google.com/document/d/186f_
>  >>>>>>>
>  amQ9XuREq8FcO7orxvOjQZtvEEYa7WPj1e8p8bM/edit#heading=h.4sqhyz68wgg2
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>      The
>  document is opened for comments.
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>      Something
>  that was also discussed not only inside Red Hat but
>  >>>>>>> with
>  >>>>>>>      some
>  community members is about the format and source of the
>  >>>>>>>
>  documentation. I strongly believe that we should have the
>  >>>>>>>
>  documentation somewhere else but the DS site source. It
>  could
>  >>>>>>>
>  improve the ease to the community to contribute with it.
>  Having
>  >>>>>>>
>  said that, it's also suggested that we should use
>  asciidoc as
>  >>>>>>>
>      documentation format.
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>      So what we
>  have until now ?
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>      - The
>  documentation plan to be reviewed and approved by the DS
>  >>>>>>>      community.
>  Then we can talk about the plans to make it happen.
>  >>>>>>>      - The
>  documentation location: Recommendation to be out of the
>  >>>>>>> site
>  >>>>>>>      source.
>  >>>>>>>      - The
>  documentation format: Suggested to use asciidoc.
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>      Please,
>  read the plan and lets discuss about these 3 topics
>  >>>>>>>
>  individually.
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>      Michelle
>  Murray (whose team provided the plan and she is copied
>  >>>>>>> on
>  >>>>>>>      this
>  Thread) can follow the feedback.
>  >>>>>>>      --
>  >>>>>>>      *Rafael
>  Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
>  >>>>>>>      JBoss
>  Developer
>  >>>>>>>
>    M: +55-61-9269-6576 <tel:%2B55-61-9269-6576>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>      Red Hat
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>      Better
>  technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
>  >>>>>>>
>  collaboration.
>  >>>>>>>      See how it
>  works at www.redhat.com <http://www.redhat.com/>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>      LinkedIn
>  <http://www.linkedin.com/company/3258288>
>  Youtube
>  >>>>>>>
>  <https://www.youtube.com/redhatlatam>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >
>
>

Reply via email to