i agree with thomas

regards,
gerhard



2016-03-25 9:23 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:

> basically +1
> Most of our customers are using 1.7 since this year.
>
> I just wonder whats the benefit for us?
> I think there are no language features which would improve our code base.
>
> 2016-03-25 3:25 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I've brought this topic up before without much positive response.  I
> figure
> > I'll bring it up again.
> >
> > I'd like to propose that DeltaSpike 1.6 be the last minor release to
> > support Java 1.6.  I suspect that most users are already using Java 7 or
> > higher.  None of our builds in CI (builds.apache.org) currently run on
> 1.6
> > either, so while we can say from a syntax standpoint we're 1.6 compliant
> > I'm not sure we can say from a JDK Library standpoint we don't rely on
> > anything from Java 7.
> >
> > We're one of the few projects that probably still supports Java 6 as a
> > mainline development, so I was hoping we could just cut 1.6 as 1.6
> > compliant, if we need to cut patch releases of 1.6 to apply patches, but
> > with DeltaSpike 1.7 and on, focus on Java 7 and up.
> >
> > John
> >
>

Reply via email to