+1, I did once use git-svn to convert a local copy a couple years back... It was super slow but worked eventually...
On Aug 4, 2017 8:40 AM, "SHAWN E SMITH" <se...@psu.edu> wrote: +1 "The programmer … works only slightly removed from pure thought-stuff. He builds his castles in the air, from air, creating by exertion of the imagination." — Fred Brooks Shawn Smith Director of Software Engineering Enterprise Infrastructure and Operations Penn State University 814-321-5227 se...@psu.edu https://keybase.io/ussmith ----- Original Message ----- From: "Emmanuel Lécharny" <elecha...@gmail.com> To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 4:16:41 AM Subject: [Vote] Switch to git for Apache LDAP API 2.0 Hi guys, "It was the best *of* times, it was the worst *of* times" (Dickens) it's a pretty big change : switching away from SVN to git. We are using svn from the very beginning, so to speak 14 years, and it's probablu time to use a more efficient and modern VCC system. To most of you, that should be a no brainer, and we already have a few sub-projects using git at Diectory (Fortress, kerby). However, I think it's important to get this vote out, as it's gong to impact the project as a whole. Note that it will just be for teh API atm, but the other projects will most certainly migrate sooner or later (ApacheDS, Studio, Mavibot and teh site) So : [ ] +1 : switch Apache LDAP API to git [ ] +/-0 : I don't mind [ ] -1 : Keep going with SVN -1 is not a veto, feel free to speak your mind. The idea is to be sure we are all on the same page here : I don't feel compelled to switch, but I do think it would make it easier for us to work on the project, and for external users to push PRs. Thanks ! -- Emmanuel Lecharny Symas.com directory.apache.org
