+1, good move
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 7:47 AM, Lucas Theisen <lucasthei...@pastdev.com> wrote:
>
> +1, I did once use git-svn to convert a local copy a couple years back... It
> was super slow but worked eventually...
>
> On Aug 4, 2017 8:40 AM, "SHAWN E SMITH" <ses44@psuedu> wrote:
> +1
>
> "The programmer … works only slightly removed from pure thought-stuff.
> He builds his castles in the air, from air, creating by exertion of the
> imagination."
> — Fred Brooks
>
> Shawn Smith
> Director of Software Engineering
> Enterprise Infrastructure and Operations
> Penn State University
> 814-321-5227
> se...@psu.edu
>
> https://keybase.io/ussmith
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Emmanuel Lécharny" <elecha...@gmail.com>
> To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 4:16:41 AM
> Subject: [Vote] Switch to git for Apache LDAP API 2.0
>
> Hi guys,
>
>
> "It was the best *of* times, it was the worst *of* times" (Dickens)
>
>
> it's a pretty big change : switching away from SVN to git. We are using
> svn from the very beginning, so to speak 14 years, and it's probablu
> time to use a more efficient and modern VCC system. To most of you, that
> should be a no brainer, and we already have a few sub-projects using git
> at Diectory (Fortress, kerby).
>
>
> However, I think it's important to get this vote out, as it's gong to
> impact the project as a whole.
>
>
> Note that it will just be for teh API atm, but the other projects will
> most certainly migrate sooner or later (ApacheDS, Studio, Mavibot and
> teh site)
>
>
> So :
>
>
> [ ] +1 : switch Apache LDAP API to git
>
> [ ] +/-0 : I don't mind
>
> [ ] -1 : Keep going with SVN
>
>
> -1 is not a veto, feel free to speak your mind. The idea is to be sure
> we are all on the same page here : I don't feel compelled to switch, but
> I do think it would make it easier for us to work on the project, and
> for external users to push PRs.
>
>
> Thanks !
>
>
> --
> Emmanuel Lecharny
>
> Symas.com
> directory.apache.org
>
