> It generates a native binary and (according to doc) takes less time to > start. But more than that we don't need to install JRE inside > the container. Those are all at the moment appear to be good things, but > haven't tested these in a container yet. > > Benefits are clear for a serverless app, not sure if thats going to be true for something like apacheds. I'd be very interested to see if there are any performance or size improvements.
- Existing ApacheDS containers? Marc Boorshtein
- Re: Existing ApacheDS containers? Kiran Ayyagari
- Re: Existing ApacheDS containers? Marc Boorshtein
- Re: Existing ApacheDS containers? Kiran Ayyagari
- Re: Existing ApacheDS containers? Marc Boorshtein
- Re: Existing ApacheDS containers? Emmanuel Lécharny
- Re: Existing ApacheDS containers? Stefan Seelmann
- Re: Existing ApacheDS containers? Emmanuel Lécharny
- Re: Existing ApacheDS containers? Marc Boorshtein