+1 especially on DL-23. - Xi
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnas...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I am also interested in participating. > > - kn > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I'd like to start the discussion about the first release. There are > still a > > few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think we need to pick > up a > > few items and cut the first release and then iterate from there. Here is > a > > list of items that I think we should include: > > > > - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>: Repackaging > namespace > > to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing) > > - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>: support scala > 2.10 > > and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged) > > - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>: Move DL to depend > > on > > central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift version, > which > > is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull request out. > > > > I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2> (using the official > > bookkeeper > > version) the blocker for the first release. We can cut a new release once > > that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure between DL and > > BK. > > > > Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe it should be included > in > > the first release. > > > > Also, is there anyone interested in being the release manager for first > > release? > > > > - Sijie > > >
