It isn't great that DistributedLog is not using the Apache BookKeeper release. Essentially anyone using DistributedLog today needs to use the Twitter branch of BookKeeper, which has diverged from Apache BookKeeper. I'm sure the changes in the Twitter branch are all great, but I'd be more comfortable being able to rely on the Apache BookKeeper releases, which are community driven.
I'm not going to block the release on this alone because it is important for this project to get a first release out soon, but we need to fix DL-2. -Flavio > On 15 Nov 2016, at 19:02, Leigh Stewart <lstew...@twitter.com.INVALID> wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny <franck.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker. >> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 especially on DL-23. >>> >>> - Xi >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnas...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> I am also interested in participating. >>>> >>>> - kn >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about the first release. There are >>>> still a >>>>> few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think we need to >> pick >>>> up a >>>>> few items and cut the first release and then iterate from there. Here >>> is >>>> a >>>>> list of items that I think we should include: >>>>> >>>>> - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>: Repackaging >>>> namespace >>>>> to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing) >>>>> - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>: support scala >>>> 2.10 >>>>> and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged) >>>>> - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>: Move DL to >>> depend >>>>> on >>>>> central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift version, >>>> which >>>>> is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull request out. >>>>> >>>>> I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2 >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2> (using the official >>>>> bookkeeper >>>>> version) the blocker for the first release. We can cut a new release >>> once >>>>> that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure between DL >>> and >>>>> BK. >>>>> >>>>> Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe it should be >>> included >>>> in >>>>> the first release. >>>>> >>>>> Also, is there anyone interested in being the release manager for >> first >>>>> release? >>>>> >>>>> - Sijie >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -franck >>
