Thank you for all the feedbacks. I will drive the release for this version. So that we can have all the procedures documented in the wiki.
I created the wiki page here for documenting the procedure: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DL/Preparing+DistributedLog+Releases - Sijie On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > Great to know the commitment of merge twitter's branch. Looking forward to > see bookkeeper 4.5. > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > > > It does make sense, Sijie, thanks for the update. > > > > -Flavio > > > > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 05:12, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Flavio, > > > > > > I totally agreed that not using an official Apache version is not > great > > > for the community. We had a bookkeeper meetup last night. We've > discussed > > > the current situation with the community. We came to a commitment to > > merge > > > Twitter's branch back into bookkeeper 4.5. After that we won't maintain > > our > > > own branch and switch to 4.5. > > > > > > Hope this make sense. > > > > > > Sijie > > > > > > On Nov 16, 2016 8:04 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <f...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > It isn't great that DistributedLog is not using the Apache BookKeeper > > > release. Essentially anyone using DistributedLog today needs to use the > > > Twitter branch of BookKeeper, which has diverged from Apache > BookKeeper. > > > I'm sure the changes in the Twitter branch are all great, but I'd be > more > > > comfortable being able to rely on the Apache BookKeeper releases, which > > are > > > community driven. > > > > > > I'm not going to block the release on this alone because it is > important > > > for this project to get a first release out soon, but we need to fix > > DL-2. > > > > > > -Flavio > > > > > >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 19:02, Leigh Stewart <lstew...@twitter.com.INVALID > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny <franck.c...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker. > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1 especially on DL-23. > > >>>> > > >>>> - Xi > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim < > > khurrumnas...@gmail.com> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I am also interested in participating. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> - kn > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about the first release. There > are > > >>>>> still a > > >>>>>> few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think we need to > > >>> pick > > >>>>> up a > > >>>>>> few items and cut the first release and then iterate from there. > > Here > > >>>> is > > >>>>> a > > >>>>>> list of items that I think we should include: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>: Repackaging > > >>>>> namespace > > >>>>>> to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing) > > >>>>>> - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>: support > > scala > > >>>>> 2.10 > > >>>>>> and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged) > > >>>>>> - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>: Move DL to > > >>>> depend > > >>>>>> on > > >>>>>> central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift > version, > > >>>>> which > > >>>>>> is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull request > out. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2 > > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2> (using the official > > >>>>>> bookkeeper > > >>>>>> version) the blocker for the first release. We can cut a new > release > > >>>> once > > >>>>>> that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure between > > DL > > >>>> and > > >>>>>> BK. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe it should be > > >>>> included > > >>>>> in > > >>>>>> the first release. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Also, is there anyone interested in being the release manager for > > >>> first > > >>>>>> release? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - Sijie > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> -franck > > >>> > > > > >
