Github user leighst commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/133#discussion_r121046188
--- Diff:
distributedlog-core/src/main/java/org/apache/distributedlog/BKLogReadHandler.java
---
@@ -201,33 +183,31 @@ public void safeRun() {
* Begin asynchronous lock acquire, but ensure that the returned
future is satisfied on an
* executor service thread.
*/
- Future<Void> acquireLockOnExecutorThread(DistributedLock lock) throws
LockingException {
- final Future<? extends DistributedLock> acquireFuture =
lock.asyncAcquire();
+ CompletableFuture<Void> acquireLockOnExecutorThread(DistributedLock
lock) throws LockingException {
+ final CompletableFuture<? extends DistributedLock> acquireFuture =
lock.asyncAcquire();
// The future we return must be satisfied on an executor service
thread. If we simply
// return the future returned by asyncAcquire, user callbacks may
end up running in
// the lock state executor thread, which will cause deadlocks and
introduce latency
// etc.
- final Promise<Void> threadAcquirePromise = new Promise<Void>();
- threadAcquirePromise.setInterruptHandler(new Function<Throwable,
BoxedUnit>() {
- @Override
- public BoxedUnit apply(Throwable t) {
- FutureUtils.cancel(acquireFuture);
- return null;
+ final CompletableFuture<Void> threadAcquirePromise = new
CompletableFuture<Void>();
+ threadAcquirePromise.whenComplete((value, cause) -> {
--- End diff --
do i understand correctly java8 future doesn't really have the concept of
interrupt?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
