Hi everyone.

I reopened the vote and agreed to it because I wanted to get opinions that
could help me assess all possible scenarios and risks.

I also want to make this a committee's effort.

I will send the final plan tomorrow with the decision I made to move
forward.

Thanks everyone.
G

On Sun, Nov 24, 2019, 1:34 PM Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah...
>
> In fact, it essentially served as a survey about the survey mechanisms.
>
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 9:44 AM Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Consider all the votes non-binding then. It's all informative
> nonetheless.
> >
> > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 23:48, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > There wasn't actually any reason to call for a vote.
> > >
> > > That didn't stop it being called for.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 1:29 PM Justin Mclean <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > > Niclas is absolutely correct here.  The decision belongs to Gris.
> > She
> > > > may
> > > > > treat the results of the vote any way she pleases.  I believe she
> has
> > > > > already expressed a preference.  There is no deadlock here.
> > > >
> > > > Why call for a vote then?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Justin
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >
>

Reply via email to