Hi folks, As per the original message where I opened the vote, I closed it on Friday, and based on the input we received, we had:
4 people voted +1 1 person voted -1 1 person voted +0 So the voted passed, also as per indicated in this thread, even when the vote wasn't binding, I wanted to provide it as a means to discuss sensitive and critical aspects we have documented well and have find ways to protect and respond to in case it's needed. I have created an entrey in the Wiki [1] where the plan can be read in an organized way as per Craig's suggestion. I'll send an email with the plat to board-private@, If I see it necessary we can also send one to board@. The reason to email the private list is to give people actually in the board visibility before the launch. Thanks and happy holidays everyone! G P.S. Big shout out to all the people who made this survey possible. It's been a great exercise and I hope we het great results out of it! [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EDI/The+2020+ASF+Community+Survey+-+Launch+Plan On 2019/11/24 12:03:43, "Kevin A. McGrail" <[email protected]> wrote: > The vote was to demonstrate consensus and done based on Sam's input on the > matter. > > The vote isn't binding but that doesn't mean it is unnecessary. It helps > guide the VP and alert members of the group to what's going on. > > It also helps put a deadline on debate so that things aren't endlessly > debated. > > Regards, KAM > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2019, 00:48 Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There wasn't actually any reason to call for a vote. > > > > That didn't stop it being called for. > > > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 1:29 PM Justin Mclean <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Niclas is absolutely correct here. The decision belongs to Gris. She > > > may > > > > treat the results of the vote any way she pleases. I believe she has > > > > already expressed a preference. There is no deadlock here. > > > > > > Why call for a vote then? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Justin > > > > > >
