On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 06:15 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > I tried it and the document was promised a proof and review. Nada. I > > waited considerable time then had it posted directly to documentation. > > Mind this was back in January but that should not have stopped a review > > but it did. I came away feeling NIH so ignore and it will go away. > > Needless to say that is what I did. Later I got commit privs on > > documentation and subsequently posted a fair bit of material. > > I am not arguing in this note. I am asking for more information. > > When you say "I tried it and the document was promised a proof > and review", which document are you referring to and where did > you submit it for review? Docs or OOoAuthors?
Way before you got involve. All was done on OOoAuthors though. > > I don't remember a submission of your user guide, but I've been > offlist (esp. from Docs) quite often while travelling over the > past two years, so your note could have been posted while I was > away and I would not have seen it. I have now searched the > archives of both the Docs list and the OOoAuthors list, and could > not find any notes from you saying that your user guide was up > for review. It's quite likely that I'm simply not finding the > note in all the traffic on those lists, so that is why I'm asking. > Like I said way before you got involved. The point is moot but I did not remove the doc from my workspace so it is likely still there unless it was removed. I certainly didn't remove it. Since you were not involved why are you concerned. If things are better with your involvememnt, and I think they are, it doesn't address what went on before your time. -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
