On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 17:29 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 18:46 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > >> Scott Carr wrote: > >> [cut] > >> > >>> The OpenOffice.org project tries to keep everyones interest in mind. > >>> Corporate as well as individual. Please see my earlier response. > >>> > >>> Everyone is free to create documentation in the license of their > >>> choice. We will be happy to link to it from the Third Party page. The > >>> project itself, tries to keep some of the legal guesswork out of > >>> submissions, thus the usage of PDL and JCA. Basically, the idea is that > >>> if you get a document from the OpenOffice.org project itself there is a > >>> certain level of understanding that is maintained through EVERY document. > >>> > >>> The Third Party page is there so we can point to some of the GREAT > >>> documents that exists elsewhere, but may not follow the same level of > >>> submission process. Trust me, over the past um, 6? years now, keeping > >>> track of all this has been FUN, to say the least. ;-) > >> Scott, > >> > >> thanks for the lucid explanation. It explains a lot that wasn't clear > >> before. > >> > >> With regard to the Third Party page; how does one request a link and is > >> a certain volume of work required to justify such a link? > >> > > > > I know I would open a rat's nest with this licensing question. :-) > > > > In any case, if you have the bandwidth, this message is sufficient to up > > a link. Hmm, maybe even a link in the tutorial section as well. Would > > that be okay? > > That would be fine. Thanks for the assistance. > > Peter HB >
Need the URL, again, please. I know it is somewhere in the users list but finding it has not been fruitful. :-( --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
