On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 18:25 +0100, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 17:44 +0100, Mechtilde wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 17:25 +0100, Mechtilde wrote:
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> I looked for documentation to OOo 2.x to help users on
> >>>> #users.openoffice.org.
> >>>>
> >>>> there I fond many very old Dokuments and some with broken links e.g the
> >>>> both files for base.
> >>>>
> >>>> Can someone update this links.
> >>> Sure if you give them. You already know the ones you mean but the rest
> >>> of us do not.
> >> Someone one the irc-channel told me to try this link:
> >>
> >> documentation.openoffice.org/manuals/oooauthors2
> >>
> >> The other one I don't know because I don't know how the side is organised.
> >>
> >> I don't also know who is resposible for these sides.
> > 
> > Your IRC contact got it wrong. Please go to
> > http://documentation.openoffice.org/manuals/ and you can get what
> > OOoAuthors has published. Or go directly to their site.
> 
> I only want that someone correct the links which are under "documents &
> files" on documentation.openoffice.org not more.
> 
> I think documentation with dead links isn't good
> 

Good you go to http://documentation.openoffice.org/ and locate all the
dead links and reprot them here. I told you before that the IRC
information you were given is incorrect so no wonder it failed. 


-- 
G. Roderick Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenOffice.org

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to