Hi Frank, Am Mittwoch 07 November 2007 schrieb Frank Peters: > Andreas Mantke wrote: > >>>>> Is it posible to get a server for plone-test-instance? > >>>>> Inside Plone it is also posible to use a wiki (Zwiki) if > >>>>> necessary. > >>>> > >>>> I don't know if it's a good idea to fork from the rest of > >>>> the wiki. We'd need to have resources to maintain our > >>>> own version of the CMS with all consequences. > >>> > >>> I don't want to split the wiki. I think - also there is a way > >>> for a wiki inside plone - this is not necessary for the work > >>> with documentation. The functions of that framework are good > >>> enough to produce and translate documentations (from faq to > >>> tutorial or book). The members of OOoAuthors used and proved > >>> it since a longer time ;-) > >> > >> If I understand you correctly, you're saying that we shouldn't > >> be using the wiki at all for docs but a CMS like plone > >> instead. > > > > only because it is easier to get the content inside the CMS and > > get also without much afford a printable version (pdf). > > For book-type documentation you're right. But books are > soooo 20th century ;-) >
and you've never heard about a story with seven volumes from an english writer (not only for children) ;-) > How about FAQs, modular Howtos...more modular and straightforward > stuff, would that remain on the wiki. Meaning, should we use a > "real" CMS just for authoring more advanced documents (like > books)? Or would that system be used or all of it? > This plone product opens the door for every thing of documentation: http://plone.org/products/plonehelpcenter I think, it's the best way to keep all documentation in one place (also nat-lang). > >> But the wiki is also very well suited for publishing that > >> content. It's instant production. Working with plone would > >> probably raise the bar for contributing again. > > I think, wiki is its program: fast fast ;-) It's good for quick collaboration, especially for people on the same level of experience. Because its goal is a fast product, its not so good for documentation of good quality (and your drafts are always published). > > I don't actually see why the use of plone instead of the wiki > > the bar of contributing raises. If I want to contribute inside > > the wiki I had to get an account (same in plone). Then I had > > to learn the special tags of mediawiki, if I want to structure > > my documentation (without a structure it would be a dessert). > > There is actual no menubar for formating. > > Inside a CMS like plone you get this menubar, looking similar > > to a menubar in your office suite ;-) > > > >> Apart from that, we don't have a plone implemented inside OOo, > >> and we would need to set something up and maintain it. > > > > That's right. I don't know if this is an real option. > > I am curious, I'll ask Jean, if I can get an account on > OOoAuthors and play with it (is there a playground on > OOoAuthors?). I will ask Marko Möller, if it is posible to create a playground / testarea inside the new plone 3 of OOoAuthors. Best regards, Andreas -- ## Content Developer OpenOffice.org: lang/DE ## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows, Solaris ## http://de.openoffice.org ## OpenOffice.org Portable: http://oooportable.org ## Meine Seite: http://www.amantke.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
