Thanks, Stephen, for the comment. Unfortunately, we don't have the dev setup nor the resources to test out this change using MSVC.
Thank you, Aditya Ambadipudi ________________________________ From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> Sent: Monday, April 1, 2024 9:05 AM To: Aditya Ambadipudi <aditya.ambadip...@arm.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>; jack...@nvidia.com <jack...@nvidia.com>; ma...@nvidia.com <ma...@nvidia.com>; viachesl...@nvidia.com <viachesl...@nvidia.com>; roret...@linux.microsoft.com <roret...@linux.microsoft.com>; konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru <konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru>; konstantin.anan...@huawei.com <konstantin.anan...@huawei.com>; m...@smartsharesystems.com <m...@smartsharesystems.com>; hof...@lysator.liu.se <hof...@lysator.liu.se>; Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; Dhruv Tripathi <dhruv.tripa...@arm.com>; Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage <wathsala.vithan...@arm.com>; ganeshadit...@gmail.com <ganeshadit...@gmail.com>; nd <n...@arm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] deque: add multithread unsafe deque library On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:37:27 -0500 Aditya Ambadipudi <aditya.ambadip...@arm.com> wrote: > As previously discussed in the mailing list [1] we are sending out this > patch that provides the implementation and unit test cases for the > RTE_DEQUE library. This includes functions for creating a RTE_DEQUE > object. Allocating memory to it. Deleting that object and free'ing the > memory associated with it. Enqueue/Dequeue functions. Functions for > zero-copy API. > > [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-August/275003.html Does this build without errors with the Microsoft Visual C compiler? Want to make sure that all new code does not create more work for the Windows maintainers.
