On 5/27/2016 5:06 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:38:32PM +0800, Huawei Xie wrote:
>>      vq->vq_ring_mem = mz->phys_addr;
>>      vq->vq_ring_virt_mem = mz->addr;
>> -    PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "vq->vq_ring_mem:      0x%"PRIx64, 
>> (uint64_t)mz->phys_addr);
>> -    PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "vq->vq_ring_virt_mem: 0x%"PRIx64, 
>> (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)mz->addr);
>> -    vq->virtio_net_hdr_mz  = NULL;
>> -    vq->virtio_net_hdr_mem = 0;
>> +    PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "vq->vq_ring_mem:      0x%"PRIx64,
>> +                 (uint64_t)mz->phys_addr);
>> +    PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "vq->vq_ring_virt_mem: 0x%"PRIx64,
>> +                 (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)mz->addr);
>> +
>> +    hdr_mz = rte_memzone_reserve_aligned(vq_hdr_name, sz_hdr_mz, socket_id,
>> +                                         0, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
> We don't need allocate hdr_mz for Rx queue, and in such case, sz_hdr_mz
> is 0. I'm wondering what hdr_mz would be then, NULL?
>
> Anyway, you should skip the hdr_mz allocation for Rx queue, and I also
> would suggest you to move the vq_hdr_name setup here.

will check sz_hdr_mz before the zone allocation.


>
>> +    if (hdr_mz == NULL) {
>> +            if (rte_errno == EEXIST)
>> +                    hdr_mz = rte_memzone_lookup(vq_hdr_name);
>> +            if (hdr_mz == NULL) {
>> +                    ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +                    goto fail_q_alloc;
>> +            }
>> +    }
>>  
> ...
>>  
>>      PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
>>      ret = virtio_dev_queue_setup(dev, VTNET_CQ, VTNET_SQ_CQ_QUEUE_IDX,
>> -                    vtpci_queue_idx, 0, socket_id, &vq);
>> +                    vtpci_queue_idx, 0, socket_id, (void **)&cvq);
> Unnecessary cast. Note that there are few others like that in this
> patch.

This cast is needed.

>
>> -            PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "dequeue:%d", num);
>> -            PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "packet len:%d", len[0]);
>> +            PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "dequeue:%d\n", num);
>> +            PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "packet len:%d\n", len[0]);
> We should not append "\n" for PMD_RX_LOG; this macro alreadys does it.

Weird. Will remove it. Thanks.

>
> Another note is that you might want to run checkpatch; I saw quite many
> warnings.

Had checked. The warnings are all due to 80 char limitation of
virtio_rxq_stats_strings. Just 4 or 5 chars cross 80 line limit. I
prefer to keep the fields aligned.

>
>       --yliu
>

Reply via email to