3.2M5 is the point at which they stabalise their interfaces. I figured
it would take time for Drools 3.0 to become mainstream, takes months
for big corporations to adopt technology, by that time Eclipse 3.2 would
be final. It makes our job a lot easier, we only have limited resources,
I didn't want a big conversion effort a few months later - plus we get
to take advantage of new Eclipse features.
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Just curious, why did the Drools IDE project choose Eclise 3.25 instead of
3.1 as this eliminates me from using it right now?
Thanks,
Ron
On 4/4/06, Greg Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you using eclipse 3.2M5 or above? The behavior
you describe would happen if you used an earlier
version.
GreG
--- fanory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have some problems with last version of
org.drools.ide_1.0.0.jar. (drools 3
beta 3)
I have copied the file in eclipse plugins directory
and restart eclipse ... but
i don't see drools project and other stuff in the
environment.
What i do wrong ?
Thanks in advance.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
