Agreed, my only problem is that I use MyEclipse and it is typically behind
the release curve some.  Hence I do not upgrade as often as I once did.

On 4/4/06, Michael Neale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yes it was mostly for the debugging features - that required the use of
> eclipse "internal" apis which are not backwards compatable (it is possible
> to port it to run on 3.1, but it would not be that good a use of time).
>
> Eclipse 3.2 final will be in june:
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/timeline/
>
> For releases like that, they are pretty good at hitting them. Most of us
> have been using M5 for some time, and now M6 is out. They are quite
> stable.
>
> On 4/5/06, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 3.2M5 is the point at which they stabalise their interfaces. I figured
> > it would take time  for Drools 3.0 to become mainstream, takes months
> > for big corporations to adopt technology, by that time Eclipse 3.2 would
> > be final. It makes our job a lot easier, we only have limited resources,
> > I didn't want a big conversion effort a few months later - plus we get
> > to take advantage of new Eclipse features.
> >
> > Mark
> > Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
> > > Just curious, why did the Drools IDE project choose Eclise 3.25instead
> > of
> > > 3.1 as this eliminates me from using it right now?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> > > On 4/4/06, Greg Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Are you using eclipse 3.2M5 or above?  The behavior
> > >> you describe would happen if you used an earlier
> > >> version.
> > >>
> > >> GreG
> > >>
> > >> --- fanory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have some problems with last version of
> > >>> org.drools.ide_1.0.0.jar. (drools 3
> > >>> beta 3)
> > >>> I have copied the file in eclipse plugins directory
> > >>> and restart eclipse ... but
> > >>> i don't see drools project and other stuff in the
> > >>> environment.
> > >>> What i do wrong ?
> > >>> Thanks in advance.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >> Do You Yahoo!?
> > >> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to