yes it was mostly for the debugging features - that required the use of eclipse "internal" apis which are not backwards compatable (it is possible to port it to run on 3.1, but it would not be that good a use of time).
Eclipse 3.2 final will be in june: http://www.eclipse.org/projects/timeline/ For releases like that, they are pretty good at hitting them. Most of us have been using M5 for some time, and now M6 is out. They are quite stable. On 4/5/06, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3.2M5 is the point at which they stabalise their interfaces. I figured > it would take time for Drools 3.0 to become mainstream, takes months > for big corporations to adopt technology, by that time Eclipse 3.2 would > be final. It makes our job a lot easier, we only have limited resources, > I didn't want a big conversion effort a few months later - plus we get > to take advantage of new Eclipse features. > > Mark > Ronald R. DiFrango wrote: > > Just curious, why did the Drools IDE project choose Eclise 3.25 instead > of > > 3.1 as this eliminates me from using it right now? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ron > > > > On 4/4/06, Greg Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Are you using eclipse 3.2M5 or above? The behavior > >> you describe would happen if you used an earlier > >> version. > >> > >> GreG > >> > >> --- fanory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I have some problems with last version of > >>> org.drools.ide_1.0.0.jar. (drools 3 > >>> beta 3) > >>> I have copied the file in eclipse plugins directory > >>> and restart eclipse ... but > >>> i don't see drools project and other stuff in the > >>> environment. > >>> What i do wrong ? > >>> Thanks in advance. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> __________________________________________________ > >> Do You Yahoo!? > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> > >> > > > > > > >
