By the way, I do think it makes sense to have a stalebot for issues. Right now we have over 1000 open issues and I doubt anyone is actively reviewing them. IMO it would be better to keep the list shorter, to things where the original filer is still actively interested in keeping them alive. But I think 60 days is a bit short, hence the suggestion in my follow up PR to raise it to 280 days (about 3 release cycles).
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:40 PM Gian Merlino <g...@apache.org> wrote: > There's been some discussion on GitHub about enabling stalebot (which we > use for PRs) for issues as well. Please check this PR out if you are > interested: https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/pull/7936. It's a > follow up to https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/pull/7927, which > is also recent. >
