the staging maven repository is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedubbo-1015/
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:44 AM Willem Ning Jiang <ningji...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm agree with Huxing, current binary release kit doesn't help lot, as > Dubbo is library Iots of people use it through the maven deployment. > My suggestion is we could put the staging maven repository in the release > vote mail for the community to check. > > On 2019/03/19 07:29:04, Huxing Zhang <hux...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I vote with: > > +1 release the software > > > > Minor issues: > > > > In the binary distributions, some jar files are missing. For example, > > the recently added etcd and consul support as registry and config > > center. > > I think the current binary distribution is meaningless. It is only a > > list of jar files, which can be found in the maven repository. > > I suggest to add some more examples to let user quickly bootstrap and > > test Dubbo in the future. > > > > Is the issue minor? Yes > > Yes No Unsure > > Could it possibly be fixed in the next release? Yes > > Yes No Unsure > > > > Details: > > > > Are release files in correct location? Yes > > Do release files have the word incubating in their name? Yes. > > Are the digital signature and hashes correct? Yes > > Does DISCLAIMER file exist? Yes > > Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists? Yes > > Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? Yes > > Is the NOTICE year correct? Yes > > Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or > NOTICE? Yes > > License information is not mentioned in NOTICE? Yes > > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so: > > > > Does the software have a compatible license? Yes > > Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE? Yes > > Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE? Yes > > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so: > > Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE > file? Yes > > > > Do all source files have ASF headers? Yes > > Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version > > control? Yes > > Are there any unexpected binary files in the release? No > > Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear? Yes > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:19 AM Ian Luo <ian....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Dubbo Community, > > > > > > This is a call for vote to release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) version > 2.7.1. > > > > > > The release candidates (RC1): > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/dubbo/2.7.1 > > > > > > Git tag for the release (RC1): > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/tree/dubbo-2.7.1 > > > > > > Hash for the release tag: > > > a36cc7520e0150d07d30e8baa0c61d5f9f11e6ed > > > > > > Release Notes: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/blob/dubbo-2.7.1/CHANGES.md > > > > > > The artifacts have been signed with Key: 9C44B5A6884984DB, which can be > > > found in the keys file: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/dubbo/KEYS > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number > of > > > votes are reached. > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > Thanks, > > > The Apache Dubbo (Incubating) Team > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards！ > > Huxing > > >
