We certainly could try to upgrade webpack to the latest version, but eslint
is another issue, it depends on wordwrap too, see more from this issue [1].

Thanks,
-Ian.

1. https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/11536

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:06 AM Huxing Zhang <hux...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Feedback from webpack community suggest to upgrade to 4.0, which no
> longer depend on wordwrap.
> For the eslint dependency I think a work around should remove it
> temporally  and add it back once the issue has been fixed.
>
> How do you think?
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 7:23 PM Ian Luo <ian....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I also reported the issue in eslint [1] community and in webpack [2]
> > community. Considering these two tools are widely adopted for javascript
> > development, they may take this seriously. But from our side, I guess
> > there's nothing more we could do for now but wait for the responses from
> > them and what legal team says.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Ian.
> >
> > 1. https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/11536
> > 2. https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/8936
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:55 PM Huxing Zhang <hux...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 4:34 PM Huxing Zhang <hux...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 3:55 PM Justin Mclean <
> jus...@classsoftware.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is probably against copyright law, and IMO just because others
> > > ignore it doesn’t mean we should.
> > > > >
> > > > > There probably a couple of courses of action:
> > > > > - Ask the maintainer of that npm module to replace that file with
> > > something that's permissible to use.
> > >
> > > I filed an issue here:
> > > https://github.com/substack/node-wordwrap/issues/21, given that the
> > > commit ceased since 2015, I don't think there will be a quick reply.
> > >
> > > > > - Ask on legal discuss for advice, they may have a better idea
> than me
> > > on what to do in this situation.
> > >
> > > I wrote a email to legal discuss, let's see how they will reply.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > How about removing the file as soon as the npm install is finished?
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > And lastly my -1 is not a veto, you only need 3 +1 and more +1s
> than
> > > -1s to release, but I would consider making a release carefully.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Justin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards!
> > > > Huxing
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards!
> > > Huxing
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards!
> Huxing
>

Reply via email to