-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19096/#review38681
-----------------------------------------------------------



client/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/LifeCycle.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19096/#comment70954>

    Why is Process execution not a lifecycle?
    Also, having the entity type and a tag applicable to each lifecycle makes 
sense.
    
    Lifecycle(EntityType entityType, Tag tag)
    
    EXECUTION(EntityType.PROCESS, Tag.DEFAULT)
    EVICT(EntityType.FEED, Tag.RETENTION)
    REPLICATE(EntityType.FEED, Tag.REPLICATION)



client/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/cli/FalconCLI.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19096/#comment70965>

    Why would you have multiple life cycles? Option says Lifecycle.



common/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/workflow/engine/AbstractWorkflowEngine.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19096/#comment70966>

    Do not do this, convert to *.



oozie/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/workflow/engine/OozieWorkflowEngine.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19096/#comment70967>

    Can you move this into a method for clarity?
    Also this needs to be rebased.



test-util/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/cluster/util/EmbeddedCluster.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19096/#comment70969>

    Why is this removed? This is necessary.



webapp/src/test/java/org/apache/falcon/cli/FalconCLIIT.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19096/#comment70971>

    There is one defined in SchemaHelper, use that.



webapp/src/test/java/org/apache/falcon/cli/FalconCLIIT.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19096/#comment70972>

    Is this option optional? if so, what is the default. I do not see a test 
case for multiple lifecycle options.



webapp/src/test/java/org/apache/falcon/cli/FalconCLIIT.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19096/#comment70975>

    There is no update to Documentation. Please update the doc for both CLI and 
REST API with the new option. Also may be FalconDocumentation.



webapp/src/test/java/org/apache/falcon/cli/FalconCLIIT.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/19096/#comment70973>

    Please make sure you run the following before uploading the patch.
    
    mvn clean verify -Phadoop-2,test-patch


- Seetharam Venkatesh


On March 26, 2014, 10:07 a.m., pavan kumar kolamuri wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19096/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 26, 2014, 10:07 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Falcon.
> 
> 
> Bugs: FALCON-240
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-240
> 
> 
> Repository: falcon-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added lifecycle option in falcon which is used to view the retention details 
> of feed
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   client/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/LifeCycle.java PRE-CREATION 
>   client/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/cli/FalconCLI.java c8ce780 
>   client/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/client/FalconClient.java f008953 
>   common/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/entity/EntityUtil.java b4bc07d 
>   
> common/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/workflow/engine/AbstractWorkflowEngine.java
>  f700b8f 
>   
> hadoop-dependencies/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/hadoop/JailedFileSystem.java
>  e12a509 
>   
> oozie/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/workflow/engine/OozieWorkflowEngine.java
>  dee77c0 
>   prism/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/resource/AbstractInstanceManager.java 
> 07ab2bc 
>   
> prism/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/resource/proxy/InstanceManagerProxy.java
>  407f39a 
>   test-util/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/cluster/util/EmbeddedCluster.java 
> af29f93 
>   webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/resource/InstanceManager.java 
> fd3cd51 
>   webapp/src/test/java/org/apache/falcon/cli/FalconCLIIT.java 5cd7beb 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19096/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> There are Unit test cases for this.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> pavan kumar kolamuri
> 
>

Reply via email to