It looks like it uses log in ServiceMediator; however, it should
probably be modified to import LogService dynamically in the future to
avoid a hard dependency or package the log packages internally.
-> richard
Roger Martin wrote:
Hi,
It depends on org.osgi.service.log? I'm looking where this may be...
---------
Enter profile name: profile4
DEBUG: WIRE: 1.0 -> org.ungoverned.osgi.service.shell -> 1.0
DEBUG: WIRE: 1.0 -> org.osgi.service.startlevel -> 0
DEBUG: WIRE: 1.0 -> org.apache.felix.shell -> 1.0
DEBUG: WIRE: 1.0 -> org.osgi.framework -> 0
DEBUG: WIRE: 1.0 -> org.osgi.service.packageadmin -> 0
ERROR: Error starting file:bundle/org.apache.felix.shell.remote-1.0.1-SNAPSHOT.j
ar (org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle 2: packa
ge; (&(package=org.osgi.service.log)(version>=1.3.0)))
org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle 2: package;
(&(package=org.osgi.service.log)(version>=1.3.0))
at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix._resolveBundle(Felix.java:1747)
at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix._startBundle(Felix.java:1610)
at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.startBundle(Felix.java:1563)
at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.setFrameworkStartLevel(Felix.java:11
35)
at org.apache.felix.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:267
)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
DEBUG: WIRE: 3.0 -> org.osgi.framework -> 0
DEBUG: WIRE: 3.0 -> org.osgi.service.obr -> 3.0
DEBUG: WIRE: 3.0 -> org.apache.felix.shell -> 1.0
On 8/30/08, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Karl Pauls schrieb:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Felix Meschberger wrote:
To also record the original authorship of the code is just another such
reference case. But I see your point about confusion (I don't think it
is a
big issue, though). So what do you think of the following extension:
Contains code originally developed and contributed to the
Apache Felix project by Dieter Wimberger
Well, I would still not be in favor of this, since it is does not follow
past precedent in Felix. We specifically started a contributor page for
this
very reason.
I agree, the above statement would set a bad precedent and make us
end-up with a lot of this kind extensions that are not really needed.
The contributor page seems to be the place to note this kind of things
to me.
Ok, I removed the attribution. The contribution is still noted on our
contributions page [1].
Regards
Felix
[1] http://felix.apache.org/site/felix-r4-contributions.html
