Hi Pierre, I was unfortunately not able to look into this mail earlier. This is in fact a known problem (unfortunately not accompanied with an issue up to now). I consider this an annoyance and thus think, we should not block this release.
If you consider this a major issue, I propose, we fix it ASAP (helping out with providing a patch certainly speeds things up) and just cut another release. For the time being, I suggest we just continue with this release. Regards Felix Pierre De Rop schrieb: > If I may participate, I suggest to have a look at the post > "http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01986.html" > before voting for a new SCR release. We suspect a concurrency bug in the > current (trunk) version. > > thanks and regards > /pierre > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases, >> >> SCR 1.0.6 >> Metatype 1.0.2 >> SCR Plugin 1.0.8 >> >> The releases are especially important as they fix a problem with >> handling the xml desscriptor files: SCR was expecting a wrong >> format (with respect to namespaces) whereas the SCR plugin created >> the wrong format (again namespace issue) which made the resulting >> bundle unuable with other SCR implementations. >> >> >> The source and binary release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5 >> message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/felix >> >> Additionally, a binary release is included (called felix-1.2.0). >> >> Please vote to approve these release archives: >> >> [ ] +1 Approve the subproject releases >> [ ] -1 Veto the releases (please provide specific comments) >> >> Thanks >> Carsten >> > >
