Hi Felix,
It's ok for a release without a fix, but is there any chance for a
small/quick patch in the trunk ?
/pierre
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi Pierre,
I was unfortunately not able to look into this mail earlier. This is in
fact a known problem (unfortunately not accompanied with an issue up to
now). I consider this an annoyance and thus think, we should not block
this release.
If you consider this a major issue, I propose, we fix it ASAP (helping
out with providing a patch certainly speeds things up) and just cut
another release.
For the time being, I suggest we just continue with this release.
Regards
Felix
Pierre De Rop schrieb:
If I may participate, I suggest to have a look at the post
"http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01986.html"
before voting for a new SCR release. We suspect a concurrency bug in the
current (trunk) version.
thanks and regards
/pierre
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases,
SCR 1.0.6
Metatype 1.0.2
SCR Plugin 1.0.8
The releases are especially important as they fix a problem with
handling the xml desscriptor files: SCR was expecting a wrong
format (with respect to namespaces) whereas the SCR plugin created
the wrong format (again namespace issue) which made the resulting
bundle unuable with other SCR implementations.
The source and binary release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here:
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/felix
Additionally, a binary release is included (called felix-1.2.0).
Please vote to approve these release archives:
[ ] +1 Approve the subproject releases
[ ] -1 Veto the releases (please provide specific comments)
Thanks
Carsten
