Procecurally, should I cut a 2.0.1 release candidate now, or can I
just add those missing packages (which I just did not copy to my home
directory, but I already have them)?
Greetings, Marcel
On Jan 30, 2009, at 16:01 , Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
-1 (on procedural ground)
Since Apache is about open source, all releases are primarily source
releases. And it is in fact the source release, which is to be voted
upon. The binary packages are just convenience (though I admit that
these days, I only care marginally for the source releases,
generally).
Regards
Felix
Marcel Offermans schrieb:
Hello all,
This is the first release candidate for the dependency manager and
its
optional shell command bundle. I've compiled everything and put it up
for testing and checking here:
http://people.apache.org/~marrs/dependencymanager-2.0.0/
The KEYS file for verifying the signature is also in this directory
and
the checksum files should have the correct format.
The main reason for naming this release 2.0.0 is that there have been
many 1.x versions and snapshots out there, so to avoid any
confusion I'm
starting with 2.0.0.
Please check the release and cast your votes, the vote will be open
for
at least 72 hours:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
Greetings, Marcel
