Hi, Marcel Offermans schrieb: > Procecurally, should I cut a 2.0.1 release candidate now, or can I just > add those missing packages (which I just did not copy to my home > directory, but I already have them)?
Good question. I would say, that in this case, it might be ok to just also upload the missing packages. Regards Felix > > Greetings, Marcel > > On Jan 30, 2009, at 16:01 , Felix Meschberger wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> -1 (on procedural ground) >> >> Since Apache is about open source, all releases are primarily source >> releases. And it is in fact the source release, which is to be voted >> upon. The binary packages are just convenience (though I admit that >> these days, I only care marginally for the source releases, generally). >> >> Regards >> Felix >> >> Marcel Offermans schrieb: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> This is the first release candidate for the dependency manager and its >>> optional shell command bundle. I've compiled everything and put it up >>> for testing and checking here: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~marrs/dependencymanager-2.0.0/ >>> >>> The KEYS file for verifying the signature is also in this directory and >>> the checksum files should have the correct format. >>> >>> The main reason for naming this release 2.0.0 is that there have been >>> many 1.x versions and snapshots out there, so to avoid any confusion I'm >>> starting with 2.0.0. >>> >>> Please check the release and cast your votes, the vote will be open for >>> at least 72 hours: >>> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >>> >>> Greetings, Marcel >>> >>> > >
