On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Marcel Offermans schrieb: >> Procecurally, should I cut a 2.0.1 release candidate now, or can I just >> add those missing packages (which I just did not copy to my home >> directory, but I already have them)? > > Good question. I would say, that in this case, it might be ok to just > also upload the missing packages.
Sounds ok to me assuming we reset the vote (i.e., votes cast already are not counted) as they can not actually have verified the release... regards, Karl > Regards > Felix > >> >> Greetings, Marcel >> >> On Jan 30, 2009, at 16:01 , Felix Meschberger wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> -1 (on procedural ground) >>> >>> Since Apache is about open source, all releases are primarily source >>> releases. And it is in fact the source release, which is to be voted >>> upon. The binary packages are just convenience (though I admit that >>> these days, I only care marginally for the source releases, generally). >>> >>> Regards >>> Felix >>> >>> Marcel Offermans schrieb: >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> This is the first release candidate for the dependency manager and its >>>> optional shell command bundle. I've compiled everything and put it up >>>> for testing and checking here: >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~marrs/dependencymanager-2.0.0/ >>>> >>>> The KEYS file for verifying the signature is also in this directory and >>>> the checksum files should have the correct format. >>>> >>>> The main reason for naming this release 2.0.0 is that there have been >>>> many 1.x versions and snapshots out there, so to avoid any confusion I'm >>>> starting with 2.0.0. >>>> >>>> Please check the release and cast your votes, the vote will be open for >>>> at least 72 hours: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >>>> >>>> Greetings, Marcel >>>> >>>> >> >> > -- Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com
