ok, we will have a solution tracked with this item: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-79
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Clement Escoffier < clement.escoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 29.04.2009, at 09:08, Toni Menzel wrote: > > The "separate VM" is a followup of our default Pax Runner based >> TestContainer implementation. >> As such, there can be (many) different TestContainer implementations. >> Its just a matter of convinience you lose when not using the pax runner >> richness. >> If there is demand for a "native" felix testcontainer, we could do so in >> quite a short amount of time. >> > > Yes, there is a demand :-). > > As you know, I did some test with pax-exam. I find it pretty cool, but my > main issue is that it dramatically slow... > For example, running 2000 test case with junit4osgi (same VM isolated > classloader) takes around 5 minutes > 20 tests with pax:exam and the pax-runner container takes around 3 minutes. > > I agree that sometimes having a separated VM is great to avoid > side-effects... But providing an alternative would be great: > -(sometimes we're looking about side effects), but of course I have ideas > about that that we can discuss (playing with test suite, were each test > suite run it's own OSGi container...). > > > Clement > > > > >> >> Toni >> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Cool. Just one question though. How difficult would it be to run the >>> tests in the same JVM in an isolated classloader ? It would make >>> debugging way easier than having to hack the test to add the necessary >>> jvm option for remote debugging. >>> >>> 2009/4/29 Alin Dreghiciu <adreghi...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> About tests, afaik iPojo will move also towards Pax Exam. We are >>>> >>> discussing >>> >>>> with Clement about doing the necessary changes in Pax Exam to support >>>> all >>>> features required by iPojo tests which were available in junit4osgi. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> >>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The past days, I've been working on the blueprint implementation >>>>> inside Geronimo [1]. >>>>> The spec is still being written so the implementation is not really >>>>> stable and is still missing a lot of features. >>>>> However, it's already somewhat usable and as I've hacked Karaf to >>>>> start using blueprint instead of spring-dm in a branch [2]. >>>>> Tests do not even compile, but I've been able to start the console, so >>>>> I thought I would talk about it a bit. >>>>> >>>>> This raises the question whether we want to switch to blueprint >>>>> instead of spring-dm. >>>>> I think we should, and even have to, given that Spring-DM will switch >>>>> to support Blueprint at some point in the future too. Also the >>>>> blueprint spec is way better than spring-dm wrt to namespace handlers >>>>> (that are considered dependencies, so we would not have problems with >>>>> namespace handlers not being available when a bundle is started) and >>>>> classloading (i think classes loaded for namespace handlers will be >>>>> loaded from the namespace handler bundle, thus freeing the bundle to >>>>> import all the namespace handlers packages), though those areas are in >>>>> flux. >>>>> >>>>> If so, we might even want to do that before renaming the packages, as >>>>> the patch is quite big and would be quite broken after the rename imho >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> As for tests, we'd have to switch to something else, which could be >>>>> junit4osgi from iPojo or pax-exam for example. >>>>> >>>>> Feedback welcome. >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/blueprint >>>>> [2] >>>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/sandbox/gnodet/karaf-blueprint/ >>> >>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Guillaume Nodet >>>>> ------------------------ >>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>>>> ------------------------ >>>>> Open Source SOA >>>>> http://fusesource.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alin Dreghiciu >>>> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open >>>> >>> Participation >>> >>>> Software. >>>> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. >>>> Looking for a job. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Guillaume Nodet >>> ------------------------ >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> ------------------------ >>> Open Source SOA >>> http://fusesource.com >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Toni Menzel >> Independent Software Developer - Looking for new projects! >> Professional Profile: http://www.osgify.com >> Blog: tonitcom.blogspot.com >> t...@okidokiteam.com >> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open >> Participation Software. >> > > -- Toni Menzel Independent Software Developer - Looking for new projects! Professional Profile: http://www.osgify.com Blog: tonitcom.blogspot.com t...@okidokiteam.com http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software.
