I think you can move forward with the current CLA that has been submitted since this code is done outside the company. But for further work I have requested that the company send in a CLA (this will be done today or tomorrow). Is that ok?
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Sten, > > Excellent. Thanks. I quickly checked it and confirm it is ok now. > > Regards > Felix > > Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb: > > Modified the inclusion slightly. Added missing license headers to > pom.xml's. > > Removed pax-runner binaries and directory. Deleted old attachements from > > jira so the current is the only one there. > > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Hi Filippo, > >> > >> Filippo Diotalevi schrieb: > >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Felix Meschberger<[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Rob Walker schrieb: > >>>>> What do we need to do make this happen guys? > >>>> The next steps are IIRC the following: > >>>> [...] > >>>> I think, we also need someone from the PMC to drive this process. > >>>> > >>>> Any volunteers (I could do it) ? > >>> Hi Felix, > >>> I'm no PMC member, but I have commit rights (and some applications > >>> using Pax-Web and the current Felix HTTP Service that I'd like to try > >>> with the new bundle). So I'll be glad to help as soon as the code > >>> donation is approved. > >> Cool. Thanks. Any help is welcome. > >> > >> I will come back to you after the IP-clearance has been done (this must > >> be done by the PMC Chair or an ASF member). > >> > >> Regards > >> Felix > >> > > >
