Ah, ok. Actually my employer is paying for my involvement in projects, but not the work done on this particular piece. Maybe I need to fax in a Corporate CLA then?
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org > >wrote: > > > >> On 8/28/09 16:30, Felix Meschberger wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Sten, > >>> > >>> Looks bascially good (files as appropriate have the license headers, > MD5 > >>> checksum matches). > >>> > >>> Just two remarks: > >>> > >>> * The pom.xml should also have the license headers > >>> (this can probably be fixed when we import into SVN) > >>> > >>> * there is a runner folder containing scripts and the > >>> pax runner library. > >>> This should probably not be included, right ? > >>> (again, I think we can start the process and just omit > >>> this directory when importing into SVN) > >>> > >>> As part of the IP-process we also need an ICLA of you, Sten, on file. I > >>> see there is one for Sten Roger Sanvik with email s...@xbm.com. Am I > >>> correct to assume, that this is your ICLA ? > >>> > >>> Thanks again for your submission, I will now start the process of > >>> getting this into Felix SVN. > >>> > >>> > >> Which will require Sten to fill out a Software Grant, which may need to > >> come from his employer if it is actually the employer who is > contributing > >> the code. > > > > > > No, it does not need to be from my employer. Been coding this in my spare > > time. It has been used at Enonic (my current workplace) in form of some > > binaries. So a grant from Enonic is not neccessary. But will be happy to > > provide one if you really need it. > > A Corporate CLA is only required if your employer pays your for working > on Apache projects. > > But what we would probably need to be good for IP clearance is a > software grant [1]. You may fax it to the same number as the ICLA. Thanks. > > > Regards > Felix > > [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt > > > > > > >> > >> -> richard > >> > >> > >> Regards > >>> Felix > >>> > >>> > >>> Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Attached the source in the jira task ( > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1456). Not sure on what > >>>> format > >>>> that the attachement should be, but created a tar.gz file. Attached a > md5 > >>>> checksum for the package. > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik<s...@x3m.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Richard S. Hall< > he...@ungoverned.org > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 8/28/09 4:36, Felix Meschberger wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Rob Walker schrieb: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> What do we need to do make this happen guys? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The next steps are IIRC the following: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> * Sten packages the source and attaches the package to > >>>>>>> the issue and publishes a package checksum. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> I will add to this, removes any existing header/copyright notices > from > >>>>>> the > >>>>>> files and adds the standard Apache header (see any Felix Java file). > >>>>>> Package > >>>>>> renaming is not necessary at this point. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> Have added apache (2.0) on top of all files. Will now create a > tarball > >>>>> and > >>>>> add it to the JIRA task. I'm also interested in getting committer > rights > >>>>> so > >>>>> that I can still maintain the code. Will that be handled in a > seperate > >>>>> vote? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> * We vote on accepting this submission > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> * We do the IP-clearance (filling out a form, > >>>>>>> sending a mail to incubator@ and wait for 72h) > >>>>>>> * Add the code into the SVN > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think, we also need someone from the PMC to drive this process. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Any volunteers (I could do it) ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> I am happy to have you do it. :-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Of course, I can help if needed. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -> richard > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Felix > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the approach > and > >>>>>>>> code > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> From our side, we can certainly run some "real world" > compatibility > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new service would > be > >>>>>>>> wrong and the current one right, just whether thenew version > breaks > >>>>>>>> anything present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure > it'll > >>>>>>>> either be fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the > >>>>>>>> current service - so not a major issue. It'll be useful though to > be > >>>>>>>> able to advise other Felix guys of anything that might differ and > >>>>>>>> need > >>>>>>>> application changes. I'm happy to make time to look at this next > >>>>>>>> week. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, we also > need > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> propose you as a committter for maintenance? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Great progress though - the current Http service has served us > pretty > >>>>>>>> well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner and fuller > >>>>>>>> solution > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- Rob > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > > >
