Hi Sten Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> As part of the IP-process we also need an ICLA of you, Sten, on file. I >> see there is one for Sten Roger Sanvik with email s...@xbm.com. Am I >> correct to assume, that this is your ICLA ? > > > Yes, but the email is wrong. It's s...@x3m.com. And the name Sten Roger > Sandvik :-) Do I need another one?
Thanks for the confirmation. I just crosschecked: It looks like there are two bugs ;-) The wrong spelling on your last name is my fault: It is correct in the registration. The wrong mail address stems from an incorrect transmission from your ICLA fax submission (the fax clearly reads s...@x3m.com. I will care to have this fixed. Regards Felix > > >> Thanks again for your submission, I will now start the process of >> getting this into Felix SVN. >> >> Regards >> Felix >> >> >> Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb: >>> Attached the source in the jira task ( >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1456). Not sure on what >> format >>> that the attachement should be, but created a tar.gz file. Attached a md5 >>> checksum for the package. >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik <s...@x3m.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org >>> wrote: >>>>> On 8/28/09 4:36, Felix Meschberger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Rob Walker schrieb: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> What do we need to do make this happen guys? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> The next steps are IIRC the following: >>>>>> >>>>>> * Sten packages the source and attaches the package to >>>>>> the issue and publishes a package checksum. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I will add to this, removes any existing header/copyright notices from >> the >>>>> files and adds the standard Apache header (see any Felix Java file). >> Package >>>>> renaming is not necessary at this point. >>>>> >>>> Have added apache (2.0) on top of all files. Will now create a tarball >> and >>>> add it to the JIRA task. I'm also interested in getting committer rights >> so >>>> that I can still maintain the code. Will that be handled in a seperate >> vote? >>>> >>>>> * We vote on accepting this submission >>>>>> * We do the IP-clearance (filling out a form, >>>>>> sending a mail to incubator@ and wait for 72h) >>>>>> * Add the code into the SVN >>>>>> >>>>>> I think, we also need someone from the PMC to drive this process. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any volunteers (I could do it) ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I am happy to have you do it. :-) >>>>> >>>>> Of course, I can help if needed. >>>>> >>>>> -> richard >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>>> Felix >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the approach and >> code >>>>>>>> From our side, we can certainly run some "real world" compatibility >>>>>>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new service would be >>>>>>> wrong and the current one right, just whether thenew version breaks >>>>>>> anything present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure it'll >>>>>>> either be fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the >>>>>>> current service - so not a major issue. It'll be useful though to be >>>>>>> able to advise other Felix guys of anything that might differ and >> need >>>>>>> application changes. I'm happy to make time to look at this next >> week. >>>>>>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, we also need >> to >>>>>>> propose you as a committter for maintenance? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Great progress though - the current Http service has served us pretty >>>>>>> well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner and fuller >>>>>>> solution >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Rob >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
