Richard S. Hall wrote: > On 2/17/10 4:35 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Richard S. Hall wrote: >> >>> Actually, the text of the license says: >>> >>> -Redistributions of source or binary code must contain the above >>> copyright notice, this notice and and the following disclaimers: >>> >>> Notice it mentions source or binary code... >>> >>> >> Yes, I noticed that :) But the oswego stuff does not redistribute the >> sun binaries, it contains classes based on source code from sun - that's >> why I thought we are safe. >> > > I have no idea, but the license talks about derivative works, which > seems would seem to cover this case too, no? > Maybe...ok as this seems to be a little bit unclear I guess we should rather add the notice (better to have it if it is not required than the other way round).
Now, as I'm actually not 100% sure what exactly we have to add to our notice it would be great if someone could add something to the notice file. I'll cancel this vote and start a new one as soon as we have the notice file updated. Thanks Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
