Done. Check it out and let me know what you think. On the positive side,
at least the copyright year in the NOTICE file will be correct now. ;-)
-> richard
On 2/17/10 4:48 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
I will update the notice file.
-> richard
On 2/17/10 4:45 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 2/17/10 4:35 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Actually, the text of the license says:
-Redistributions of source or binary code must contain the above
copyright notice, this notice and and the following disclaimers:
Notice it mentions source or binary code...
Yes, I noticed that :) But the oswego stuff does not redistribute the
sun binaries, it contains classes based on source code from sun -
that's
why I thought we are safe.
I have no idea, but the license talks about derivative works, which
seems would seem to cover this case too, no?
Maybe...ok as this seems to be a little bit unclear I guess we should
rather add the notice (better to have it if it is not required than the
other way round).
Now, as I'm actually not 100% sure what exactly we have to add to our
notice it would be great if someone could add something to the notice
file.
I'll cancel this vote and start a new one as soon as we have the notice
file updated.
Thanks
Carsten
