FELIX-2172

Cheers,

David

On 5 March 2010 12:49, Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The patch didn't make it. Can you create a jira and attach it there
> please? We have high hopes that the new resolver in trunk will work
> with this kind of scenarios...
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:33 PM, David Bosschaert
> <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes, it's quite simple to reproduce.
>>
>> 1. Check out CXF-DOSGi from http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/trunk
>> 2. First simply do a build with 'mvn install' from the root to get
>> everything ready (you may have to set MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx512m)
>> 3. cd into systests2/multi-bundle
>> 4. Then run: 'mvn install -Dtest=TestDiscoveryRountrip' from there.
>> You will see that it runs some test (which uses a fairly large number
>> of bundles). It's currently configured to use Equinox via Pax Exam.
>> 5. Applying the attached patch will change it to use Felix.
>> 6. Run: 'mvn install -Dtest=TestDiscoveryRountrip' again, and you'll
>> see that just after 'Welcome to Felix' it hangs.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David
>>
>> On 3 March 2010 17:30, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>>> On 3/3/10 12:13 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Nice :) I've had lots of hangs (or extremely long resolves) in the
>>>> CXF-DOSGi system tests, which run using Pax Exam. Does anyone know how
>>>> to get Pax Exam to use this latest build? Currently I'm using:
>>>>   CoreOptions.frameworks(CoreOptions.felix())
>>>> to simply select felix...
>>>>
>>>
>>> If you can find a simple way to reproduce any long resolves, let me know
>>> since I'd like to play with them...
>>>
>>> -> richard
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> On 3 March 2010 16:55, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For those using framework from trunk, I've merged work from my sandbox
>>>>> into
>>>>> the trunk...the changes are fairly substantial.
>>>>>
>>>>> The changes are not complete and the API will likely be in flux for a
>>>>> while,
>>>>> but the framework should be reasonably stable (i.e., still passing the
>>>>> CT).
>>>>> The big change for now is the introduction of a new resolver
>>>>> implementation.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are someone experiencing "hangs" from long resolver cycles, feel
>>>>> free
>>>>> to try the snapshot and see if it makes a difference for you. In fact,
>>>>> any
>>>>> usage and reporting of issues would be helpful.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> ->  richard
>>>>>
>>>>> p.s. Currently, I am unable to publish a snapshot, but I will try to do
>>>>> that
>>>>> later (for the time being you can build from trunk).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpa...@gmail.com
>

Reply via email to