On Friday, February 4, 2011, Jeremy Hughes <hugh...@apache.org> wrote: > Just to be clear does "failed release" mean: > > i) a release whose artifacts were published e.g. to apache.org/dist or > maven central then found to be bad
Afaik, maven central has since a loooong time a policy to never change a published artifact which definitely makes sense, so even if we want to do that (but which sane person would), it would not be possible. > ii) a release that failed before the artifacts were published > > I had been working to ii) but I can see there could be confusion. > > Jeremy > > On 4 February 2011 08:50, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Following the discussion, I'm starting a vote to decide on a policy >> for failed releases. >> >> [ ] A - Releases following a failed release can reuse the same version >> [ ] B - Releases following a failed release must use a different version >> >> The vote will be opened for at least 72 hours. >> Happy voting! >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
